Here you see an example of a customer who couldn’t get his tomato plants to work at home. The tomatoes were small, didn’t look healthy and didn’t taste well. After soaking the seeds in Organic Fertilizer and applying Organic Fertilizer to the plants two to three times, the results were much better. The tomatoes were bigger, looked healthier and were much richer and sweeter in taste. Not only were the tomatoes much higher quality, the customer also gained a lot of fun growing!
While the results of this Australian customer weren’t necessarily bad, he still decided to give our Organic Fertilizer a try. He started a small experiment to test if Organic Fertilizer would positively impact his garlic plants. After having applied Organic Fertilizer to some but not all of his garlic plants, he compared the two groups. The difference turned out to be immense. The ten pieces of garlic from the plants that weren’t fed with Organic Fertilizer, weighed a total of 1,195 kg. The ten pieces of garlic from the plants that were fed with Organic Fertilizer, weighed a total of 2,410 kg. That makes the FytoBooster garlic more than twice as big, with an astounding difference of 1,215 kg per 10 pieces of garlic.
For clarification: Organic Fertilizer is internationally sold as “Aloe Vera Fertilizer”
OBSERVATION | TREATMENT | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Organic Fertilizer | Chemical Fertilizer | |||
Plot area | 53.2 m2 | 53.2 m2 | ||
Amount of clusters harvested | 945 | 945 | ||
Average of tillers per cluster | 15.3 | 14.6 | ||
Harvest | Gross | Net | Gross | Net |
45.0 kg | 43.5 kg | 46.0 kg | 38.5 kg |
OBSERVATION | TREATMENT | ||
---|---|---|---|
0% Organic Fertilizer + 100% Chemical Fertilizer (A) | 50% Organic Fertilizer + 50% Chemical Fertilizer (B) | 100% Organic Fertilizer + 100% Chemical Fertilizer (C) | |
Average of tillers per cluster | 19.6 | 20.5 | 22 |
Amount of clusters harvested | 132 | 132 | 132 |
Harvest yield | 6.45 ton/ha | 7.08 ton/ha | 10.21 ton/ha |
TREATMENT | Yield per hectare (ton) | Yield increase compared with conventional 100% Chemical Fertilizer |
---|---|---|
A | 6.45 | – |
B | 7.08 | 9.76% |
C | 10.21 | 58.29% |
Rice plants after 80 days | |
---|---|
A
|
B
|
C
|
|
Treatment | Non fertilizer cost (US$) | Fertilizer cost (US$) | Total cost (US$) | Cost increase (US$) | Total value of yield (US$) | Value of yield increase (US$) | Result | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemical | Organic | |||||||
A | 736 | 104 | – | 840 | – | 2,376 | – | – |
B | 736 | 52 | 52 | 840 | – | 2,608 | 232 | Profitable |
C | 736 | 104 | 104 | 944 | 104 | 3,761 | 1,385 | Profitable |
Observation | Organic Fertilizer + Chemical Fertilizer | Chemical Fertilizer |
---|---|---|
Land area | 2.300 m2 | 2.700 m2 |
Fertilizer
– Chemical – Organic |
Standard 10 litres |
Standard – |
Harvest | 13.125 kg | 11.250 kg |
Organic Fertilizer applied to tomatoes |
Observation | Organic Fertilizer + Chemical Fertilizer | Chemical Fertilizer |
---|---|---|
Land area | 1 Hectare | 1 Hectare |
Fertilizer
– Chemical – Aloe Vera |
Standard 12 litres |
Standard – |
Harvest | 16.000 kg | 9.000 kg |
Organic Fertilizer applied to onions. |